How the language you speak changes your view of the world

How the language you speak changes your view of the world

German speakers think more about their goals. German speaking via FuzzBones/

Bilinguals get all the perks. Better job prospects, a cognitive boost and even protection against dementia. Now new research shows that they can also view the world in different ways depending on the specific language they are operating in.

The past 15 years have witnessed an overwhelming amount of research on the bilingual mind, with the majority of the evidence pointing to the tangible advantages of using more than one language. Going back and forth between languages appears to be a kind of brain training, pushing your brain to be flexible.

Just as regular exercise gives your body some biological benefits, mentally controlling two or more languages gives your brain cognitive benefits. This mental flexibility pays big dividends especially later in life: the typical signs of cognitive ageing occur later in bilinguals – and the onset of age-related degenerative disorders such as dementia or Alzheimer’s are delayed in bilinguals by up to five years.

Germans know where they’re going

In research we recently published in Psychological Science, we studied German-English bilinguals and monolinguals to find out how different language patterns affected how they reacted in experiments.

We showed German-English bilinguals video clips of events with a motion in them, such as a woman walking towards a car or a man cycling towards the supermarket and then asked them to describe the scenes.

Is she walking? Or walking towards the car?Walking via Radu Razvan/

When you give a scene like that to a monolingual German speaker they will tend to describe the action but also the goal of the action. So they would tend to say “A woman walks towards her car” or “a man cycles towards the supermarket”. English monolingual speakers would simply describe those scenes as “A woman is walking” or “a man is cycling”, without mentioning the goal of the action.

The worldview assumed by German speakers is a holistic one – they tend to look at the event as a whole – whereas English speakers tend to zoom in on the event and focus only on the action.

The linguistic basis of this tendency appears to be rooted in the way different grammatical tool kits situated actions in time. English requires its speakers to grammatically mark events that are ongoing, by obligatorily applying the –ing morpheme: “I am playing the piano and I cannot come to the phone” or “I was playing the piano when the phone rang”. German doesn’t have this feature.

Research with second language users shows a relationship between linguistic proficiency in such grammatical constructions and the frequency with which speakers mention the goals of events.

In our study we also found that these cross-linguistic differences extend beyond language usage itself, to nonverbal categorisation of events. We asked English and German monolinguals to watch a series of video clips that showed people walking, biking, running, or driving. In each set of three videos, we asked subjects to decide whether a scene with an ambiguous goal (a woman walks down a road toward a parked car) was more similar to a clearly goal-oriented scene (a woman walks into a building) or a scene with no goal (a woman walks down a country lane).

German monolinguals matched ambiguous scenes with goal-oriented scenes more frequently than English monolinguals did. This difference mirrors the one found for language usage: German speakers are more likely to focus on possible outcomes of people’s actions, but English speakers pay more attention to the action itself.

Switch languages, change perspective

When it came to bilingual speakers, they seemed to switch between these perspectives based on the language context they were given the task in. We found that Germans fluent in English were just as goal-focused as any other native speaker when tested in German in their home country. But a similar group of German-English bilinguals tested in English in the United Kingdom were just as action-focused as native English speakers.

In another group of German-English bilinguals, we kept one language in the forefront of their minds during the video-matching task by making participants repeat strings of numbers out loud in either English or German. Distracting one language seemed to automatically bring the influence of the other language to the fore.

When we “blocked” English, the bilinguals acted like typical Germans and saw ambiguous videos as more goal-oriented. With German blocked, bilingual subjects acted like English speakers and matched ambiguous and open-ended scenes. When we surprised subjects by switching the language of the distracting numbers halfway through the experiment, the subjects’ focus on goals versus process switched right along with it.

These findings are in line with other research showing distinct behaviour in bilinguals depending on the language of operation. Israeli Arabs are more likely to associate Arab names such as Ahmed and Samir with positive words in an Arabic language context than in a Hebrew one, for example.

People self-report that they feel like a different person when using their different languages and that expressing certain emotions carries different emotional resonance depending on the language they are using.

When judging risk, bilinguals also tend to make more rational economic decisions in a second language. In contrast to one’s first language, it tends to lack the deep-seated, misleading affective biases that unduly influence how risks and benefits are perceived. So the language you speak in really can affect the way you think.

Continue reading

How to say ‘vote for me’ in India – 447 different ways

How to say ‘vote for me’ in India – 447 different ways
With 814m voters, 29 languages spoken by at least 1m people, and 447 mother tongues, India’s election is a test of linguistic as well as political skills
Share 201

British journalists: if you think you’ve got it tough trying to appeal to a global English-speaking audience, spare a thought for the candidates in this month’s Indian general election.

Continue reading

Androids in Amazonia

9 March 2013, 2.50pm AEST
Androids in Amazonia: recording an endangered language


Steven Bird
Associate Professor in Computer Science at University of Melbourne

Steven Bird receives funding from the Australian Research Council and the US National Science Foundation.

The University of Melbourne
Provides funding as a Founding Partner of The Conversation.

Augustine, one of the few remaining speakers of Tembé, recording a story using an Android phone. Steven Bird
The village of Akazu’yw lies in the rainforest, a day’s drive from the state capital of Belém, deep in the Brazilian Amazon.

Last week I went to Akazu’yw, carrying a dozen Android phones with a specialised app for recording speech. My students and I had developed the software in Melbourne. How effectively would it work in Amazonia?

The plan was to record and translate the stories of the surviving speakers of Tembé, a critically endangered language of the Amazon, with just 150 speakers left. Continue reading

Our obsession with grammatical correctness

Our obsession with grammatical correctness

ByDr Albert P’Rayan – CHENNAI

Published: 16th September 2013 08:19 AM

Last Updated: 17th September 2013 08:31 AM

A week ago, I curiously went through a Class IX English test paper. One of the questions was this: How many types of pronouns are there? Explain reflexive pronouns and interrogative pronouns with examples. With even more curiosity, I talked to the students. It was a feeling of surprise when students parroted the answer to the question and gave examples of reflexive and interrogative pronouns. A great shock followed the surprise. None of the students could use their knowledge of grammar effectively in ordinary communication. Their spoken as well as their written communication was rather mechanical and they were not able to use the language creatively.

I don’t understand why teachers bombard students with grammatical terms. In my two decades of English language teaching career, I don’t remember having used the terms ‘interrogative pronoun’ and ‘reflexive pronoun’ even once in the classroom. It doesn’t imply that I’m not good at teaching grammar. It has been proved that grammar can be taught contextually and effectively without using all these grammatical terms.

There are two kinds of grammar teachers: prescriptive grammarians and descriptive grammarians. Prescriptive grammarians are obsessed with grammatical correctness, fond of using grammatical terms and emphasize the rules of the language. Descriptive grammarians are fond of the usage of those who speak the language, discuss how native speakers of English actually use the language in their day to day communication and they don’t give importance to the norms of correctness. In India, most teachers of English are obsessed with the rules of grammar. Continue reading

Hey, Flipper! How dolphins learn each other’s names

Hey, Flipper! How dolphins learn each other’s names

Tia Ghose, LiveScience

July 22, 2013 at 10:35 PM ET

Vincent M. Janik / Univ. of St Andrews

Bottlenose dolphins live in a sea of sound, making complex vocalizations to communicate.

Dolphins call to each other using distinctive whistles that serve as names, new research suggests.

Each dolphin makes its own unique whistle, and close friends or family will reply with the same sound. The findings, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggest that the dolphins use the whistles like names. Past research showed individual dolphins had personal whistles, but it wasn’t clear that other members of their group learned that whistle.

“These are learned individual calls animals can sometimes copy to label or address one another,” said study co-author Stephanie King, a marine mammal scientist at the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom.

The findings also reveal parallels between Continue reading